Builder.io × KPMG
Builder.io x KPMG, closing the design-to-engineering gap at 88% faster delivery
88% faster delivery
Months of handoff cycles to same-day reviews
Members read free
Unlock the full breakdown
Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in — enjoy the library.
Why it works
The case study earns its headline by grounding the 88% faster delivery claim in a concrete before-state: months-long handoff cycles with multiple redline rounds and a dedicated person just to maintain design system alignment. The mechanism is specific enough to follow: a custom component library built in Builder, fed by knowledge and accessibility files, connected to the live codebase so designers push pull requests directly rather than handing off to engineers. The secondary New Capability angle is genuine because designers writing production code through the same surface as engineers was not merely faster before, it was not happening at all.
Steal this
Quantify the before-state at the task level, not just the project level. Saying design reviews dropped from ten days to the same day is far more persuasive than a top-line percentage alone, because readers can map it to their own calendar.
Click to enlarge ↗ This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Builder.io's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.