CircleCI × ANA Systems
CircleCI x ANA Systems, 1,000 hours of manual work eliminated per month
1,000 hours of man-hours reduced per month
Manual bottlenecks to near-zero manual labor
Members read free
Unlock the full breakdown
Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in — enjoy the library.
Why it works
The case study earns its headline number by grounding it in a specific headcount (300 users) and a concrete before-state where library managers were doing manual work across every build, test, and deploy step. The mechanism is clear enough to follow: push-triggered automated testing replaced manual processes, and security verification was shifted left into the pipeline. The story also layers in a secondary capability gain around security, which had been literally impossible to automate before.
Steal this
Anchor the efficiency claim to both a user count and an hours-per-month figure simultaneously. Saying '300 people use it and it saves 1,000 hours per month' is more credible than either number alone and takes one extra sentence to write.
Click to enlarge ↗ This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are CircleCI's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.