CrowdStrike × Cullinan Holdings
CrowdStrike x Cullinan Holdings, from blind spots to trusted alerts
Security alerts reduced by 65%
Chasing our tails to trusting every alert
Members read free
Unlock the full breakdown
Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in — enjoy the library.
Why it works
The story leads clearly with the before-state of not knowing: the team could not trust its alerts and was routinely chasing false positives, which is a Clarity framing. The 65% alert reduction is the supporting proof that the noise collapsed, not that the business grew, so Efficiency is a strong secondary but not the lead. The four-week deployment across 1,000 endpoints gives the story a concrete delivery milestone that grounds the otherwise abstract security narrative.
Steal this
Open with a trust failure rather than a volume problem. Saying 'we couldn't trust the information we were getting' is more visceral and credible than 'we had too many alerts', and it makes the resolution feel earned rather than mechanical.
Click to enlarge ↗ This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are CrowdStrike's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.