Datadog × NatWest Boxed
90% cost allocation, up from 50%
Cost blindness to full allocation visibility
Members read free
Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in — enjoy the library.
The story leads with the visibility problem: teams could not see where costs came from or attribute them accurately, which is a textbook Clarity before-state. The 45% cost savings sits alongside the allocation jump, making this a close call with Efficiency, but the headline and opening frame the win as knowing, not saving. The concrete before-and-after allocation figure (50% to 90%) gives the Clarity story a hard number to anchor on, which is unusual for this story type and strengthens the piece.
Pair a process metric (cost allocation accuracy) with a savings metric so the story shows both the visibility win and the downstream financial payoff, giving two audiences a number to take away.
Click to enlarge ↗ This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Datadog's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.