← All case studies

Depot × People Data Labs

Depot x People Data Labs: 68% cheaper CI, 3,000 lines of code gone

68% reduction in CI spend

Infrastructure maintenance to innovation mode

Members read free

Unlock the full breakdown

Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Why it works

The case study leads with three concrete, attributable numbers (25% faster, 68% cost reduction, 3,000 lines removed) that give the story a clear, verifiable anchor. The before-state is unusually specific, detailing disk-space failures, OOM errors, a 1GB cache ceiling caused by AWS-to-Azure latency, and a custom ECS operator built from scratch, which makes the improvement feel earned rather than claimed. The unlimited caching benefit edges into New Capability territory since the team explicitly shifted mental models from avoiding caching to caching everything.

Steal this

Quantify the hidden engineering tax: the case study counts lines of deleted code (3,000) as a first-class result metric, which makes the maintenance burden concrete and memorable in a way that 'reduced complexity' never would.

Full screenshot of Depot x People Data Labs: 68% cheaper CI, 3,000 lines of code gone Click to enlarge ↗
View the original on depot.dev ↗

This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Depot's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.

  • Vendor Depot
  • Customer People Data Labs
  • Industry SaaS
  • Trigger Expensive, glitchy self-hosted GitHub Actions runners driving up cost and engineering overhead
  • Format Written narrative
  • Structure Challenge-Solution-Results
  • Medium Web page