← All case studies

Lindy × Truemed

Lindy x Truemed, support lead builds his own tools without engineering

67% lower cost per automated ticket ($1.00 to $0.33)

Blocked by the engineering queue to building tools independently

Members read free

Unlock the full breakdown

Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Why it works

The story earns its efficiency tag cleanly: two numbers go down (cost per ticket, headcount required) and both are specific and attributed. The secondary New Capability angle is real because the support lead genuinely could not build these tools before, but the headline leads with cost reduction so Efficiency wins the tie-break. The 'junior developer that works just for me' quote carries actual information about how Colin used the product rather than generic praise.

Steal this

Reframe the protagonist as the builder, not the buyer. Colin is positioned as someone who gained creative agency, not just a faster workflow. That framing makes the case study appeal to any non-technical operator sitting behind an engineering backlog, which massively widens the addressable reader.

Full screenshot of Lindy x Truemed, support lead builds his own tools without engineering Click to enlarge ↗
View the original on lindy.ai ↗

This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Lindy's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.

  • Vendor Lindy
  • Customer Truemed
  • Industry Fintech / Payments
  • Trigger Support volume scaling faster than engineering capacity could serve it
  • Format Written narrative
  • Structure Challenge-Solution-Results
  • Medium Web page