Maze × Hopper
Maze x Hopper: 2x faster research at 75% lower cost
2x faster research process; 75% cost reduction
Manual, expensive, seat-limited research to fast, affordable, self-serve research at scale
Members read free
Unlock the full breakdown
Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in — enjoy the library.
Why it works
The case study earns its headline metrics with direct attribution: a named designer quotes the 50% time saving and 75% cost reduction in the same breath, so neither figure floats free. The before-state is concrete, covering seat limits, manual outreach coordination, and slow analysis, which makes the contrast credible. The MVP web portal vignette (1,500+ responses, 87% success rate) adds a second, specific evidence point that keeps the piece from resting on percentages alone.
Steal this
Anchor one abstract efficiency claim (2x faster) with a discrete, time-bounded story: Hopper's 6-week MVP study with 1,500+ responses and an 87/13 split gives readers a real-world proof point that makes the headline metric feel earned rather than vendor-spun.
Click to enlarge ↗ This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Maze's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.