Navan × 1E
Navan x 1E: 160 hours saved monthly by consolidating a broken T&E stack
160 hours saved per month on expenses
Clunky, invisible, and uncontrolled to automated and fully visible
Members read free
Unlock the full breakdown
Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in — enjoy the library.
Why it works
The case study leads with a concrete time savings number, which anchors it firmly in Efficiency. The Clarity angle is strong too since the before-state included explicit auditor findings about lack of visibility, but the headline metric is hours saved rather than insight gained, so Efficiency wins the tie-break. Naming Egencia as the displaced incumbent and noting off-platform booking behavior makes the competitive switch credible and specific.
Steal this
Open with a direct quote calling the old process 'clunky, slow, and very time consuming' before introducing any product details. It grounds the problem in a real person's words and makes the pain tangible immediately.
Click to enlarge ↗ This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Navan's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.