← All case studies

Okta × Navan

Okta x Navan, ditching in-house IAM to stay focused on T&E

50% reduction in password reset requests

Identity burden to innovation focus

Members read free

Unlock the full breakdown

Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Why it works

The case study earns its keep by framing identity as a strategic distraction cost, not just a security checkbox. The repeated quote pattern across three different executives (CIO, security head, comms lead) signals broad organizational buy-in rather than a single champion. The Efficiency tag wins over Resilience because the headline metrics and narrative emphasis land on freed developer time and reduced operational friction, though the security risk reduction is a genuine second theme.

Steal this

The three-executive quote structure, each describing the same platform benefit from a different functional lens (security, product, communications), lets readers self-select the angle most relevant to their own role.

Full screenshot of Okta x Navan, ditching in-house IAM to stay focused on T&E Click to enlarge ↗
View the original on okta.com ↗

This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Okta's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.

  • Vendor Okta
  • Customer Navan
  • Industry SaaS
  • Trigger In-house IAM proved inadequate as identity-based attacks increased during hypergrowth
  • Format Written narrative
  • Structure Challenge-Solution-Results
  • Medium Web page