← All case studies

Ramp × Betterment

Ramp x Betterment: hours back from a broken multi-entity expense process

4-5 hours/week saved on receipt tracking

Manual reconciliation chaos to automated, accurate close

Members read free

Unlock the full breakdown

Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Why it works

The case study grounds every claim in concrete time savings across three distinct workflows: spend review, receipt tracking, and reimbursements. The competitor is not named, but the switch is explicit and the before-state is specific enough to be credible. Clarity is a secondary thread because better NetSuite sync gave the finance team a trusted source of truth, but the headline numbers all point downward, making Efficiency the clear primary.

Steal this

Anchor each result to a named role and a specific task. Attributing '4-5 hours/week saved' directly to the senior accountant's receipt work makes the metric concrete and human rather than a corporate abstraction.

Full screenshot of Ramp x Betterment: hours back from a broken multi-entity expense process Click to enlarge ↗
View the original on ramp.com ↗

This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Ramp's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.

  • Vendor Ramp
  • Customer Betterment
  • Industry Fintech / Payments
  • Trigger Contract with legacy platform ending, multi-entity coding rules failing
  • Format Written narrative
  • Structure Challenge-Solution-Results
  • Medium Web page