Payhawk × State of Play
Payhawk x State of Play, from spend blindness to venue-level visibility
Fragmented and reactive to real-time and transparent
Members read free
Unlock the full breakdown
Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in — enjoy the library.
Why it works
The case study earns the Clarity tag because the before-state is explicitly about not being able to see spend across entities, not about costs being too high or growth being too slow. The competitive switch from Bill.com and traditional bank cards to Payhawk is named plainly, which adds credibility. The quotes carry real operational detail rather than generic praise, which is the strongest element here, though no specific metric anchors the impact section.
Steal this
Use named, role-specific quotes from two different people in the customer organisation to show the problem from both the group finance and the regional finance perspective, making the before-and-after concrete from multiple vantage points.
Click to enlarge ↗ This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Payhawk's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.