PipeRocket × DevRev
3x Pipeline ROAS (from 1.1x to 3.0x); pipeline grew 7x vs prior period
Channel about to be shut down to top pipeline source
Members read free
Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in — enjoy the library.
The before-state is specific and credible: a 1.1x pipeline ROAS and a sales team wasting time on leads that could never close, with a shutdown decision imminent. The mechanism is detailed enough to replicate: audit the ICP gap, rebuild messaging from sales call recordings, layer firmographic visitor intelligence, and use broad match deliberately as a discovery tool before concentrating budget. The results table breaks down ROAS and ICP lead rate by region, which is unusually granular and makes the headline number verifiable rather than vague.
Starting the ad rebuild with sales call recordings rather than keyword data — comparing enterprise vs. startup call language to expose the messaging gap before touching the account — is a concrete, repeatable discovery move worth lifting.
Click to enlarge ↗ This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are PipeRocket's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.