← All case studies

Proofpoint × Bilfinger

Proofpoint x Bilfinger, closing the supply chain email fraud gap

Brand misuse risk to authenticated email confidence

Members read free

Unlock the full breakdown

Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.

Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Why it works

The story earns its Resilience tag because the core win is that a bad thing stopped happening: fraudulent use of the Bilfinger domain is now blocked at the reject-policy level. The Clarity secondary tag fits because a concrete before-state of blindness is named: the IT team no longer knew who was sending legitimate email on the Bilfinger domain, which made any enforcement policy impossible. The mechanism is explained well enough to follow, walking through DMARC, the managed-service consultant model, and the third-party sender inventory process.

Steal this

Name the invisible obstacle inside the solution section. The detail about rogue internal divisions commissioning their own email providers without IT knowledge reframes a technical project as an organizational discovery problem, making the vendor's managed-service model feel necessary rather than optional.

Full screenshot of Proofpoint x Bilfinger, closing the supply chain email fraud gap Click to enlarge ↗
View the original on proofpoint.com ↗

This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Proofpoint's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.

  • Vendor Proofpoint
  • Customer Bilfinger
  • Industry Industrial / Manufacturing
  • Trigger Evidence that Bilfinger domain was being used to spread malware
  • Format Written narrative
  • Structure Challenge-Solution-Results
  • Medium Web page