Snyk × TechnologyOne
Snyk x TechnologyOne, from 90-minute rebuild loops to seconds
90 minutes to seconds to fix a vulnerability
Security as blocker to security as enabler
Members read free
Unlock the full breakdown
Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in — enjoy the library.
Why it works
The case study grounds its headline claim in a concrete mechanism: late-stage security feedback forced multi-hour rebuild cycles, and moving feedback into the IDE and PR scanning broke that cycle. The 90-minutes-to-seconds framing is specific and credible because the rebuild cost is explained step by step. The secondary angle, coverage across new languages and frameworks, is a genuine New Capability story that sits cleanly alongside the efficiency win without muddying it.
Steal this
Quantify the rebuild tax, not just the fix time. Saying 'a 30-minute build done three times equals 90 minutes of waste' makes the before-state viscerally expensive and makes the seconds-level improvement feel proportionate rather than oversold.
Click to enlarge ↗ This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Snyk's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.