Timescale × Captura (formerly Skylab)
Timescale x Captura: 600GB to 40GB, 5x cost cut without compression
Database size reduced from 600GB to 40GB; 5x reduction in operational costs
Bottlenecked and over-provisioned to lean and stable
Members read free
Unlock the full breakdown
Enter your email to open every case study in the library: the full screenshot, why it works, and the one thing worth stealing. One email unlocks all of them.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
You're in — enjoy the library.
Why it works
The story leads with two concrete numbers going down, storage and cost, which makes Efficiency the clear primary type. The competitive switch from InfluxDB is named explicitly, adding credibility to the before-state. The hardware comparison, from a 64-core, 512GB RAM machine to a 4-core, 16GB RAM setup, is an unusually vivid way to show resource efficiency without requiring the reader to interpret abstract percentages.
Steal this
Use a hardware spec comparison (cores and RAM before vs. after) as a concrete proxy for cost and performance gains when dollar figures are not available.
Click to enlarge ↗ This is editorial commentary and curation. The case study, screenshot, and all metrics are Timescale's published work; we link to the source and lead with our analysis.